Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

That’s just brilliant! You ought to run for president. /s


29 posted on 04/09/2013 11:17:23 AM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
The initial background check (NICS system) is forbidden by law from retaining records of background checks past 24 hours after the purchase is okayed.

"Keeping records" of background checks would eventually provide a database of every person who has purchased a firearm since the law passed.

This is a de facto registry of firearm owners, only excluding those who bought no new firearms.

In the event that someone gets a bill (or amendment to another bill) through requiring private sales to go through a dealer and be subject to NICS clearance, within a generation, virtually every legally transferred (owned) firearm would be in the registry, and a very high fraction of legal firearm owners.

The enemies of this Republic have been patient when impatience would not work, and this would lay all the necessary groundwork for seizure of firearms in the future, much as registration under the Weimar Republic laid the groundwork for the seizure of firearms by the Nazis--the records survived to be used against firearm owners.

With other developments in this administration, I would never trust the Government with such a database, not now, nor in the future. Not ever.

We have seen how well-intentioned programs have been sold to the American People under one guise or another, and then used to harm our Country, our culture, and our society.

Judge this not by the good it might do in the right hands, but the harm it will do in the wrong ones.

30 posted on 04/09/2013 1:29:14 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

I hope you don’t, if you don’t understand that “moderate” incursions on our right to keep and bear arms are dangerous in the same way that radical incursions are.


33 posted on 04/09/2013 2:07:57 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Real republicans, yes. RINOs, no, under no circumstances.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson