[rockinqsranch]

Just the act of challenging RJS1950’s obvious euphamism indicated to me you were looking for a fight, and your response in this last post, an obvious attempt to turn the argument to fault RJS1950 confirms it.

You are a twit.

[UCANSEE2]

Just the act of challenging RJS1950’s obvious euphamism indicated to me you were looking for a fight, and your response in this last post, an obvious attempt to turn the argument to fault RJS1950 confirms it.

Please consider this. Out of the hundreds who have read these posts, and the dozens who are making comments, you are the only one who has chosen to 'see it' that way.

Reset-to-Zero only asked why you attacked and asked you to watch the name calling. Perfectly reasonable, and courteous behavior. If we have only to go by what is written in the string of posts above (we call it 'documented fact'), then it would appear to any unbiased reader that you are the one picking a fight.

[American in Israel]

[Resettozero]

Just the act of challenging RJS1950’s obvious euphamism indicated to me you were looking for a fight, and your response in this last post, an obvious attempt to turn the argument to fault RJS1950 confirms it.

You were wrong on all points in your post, except the loophole "indicated to me". Wasn't picking a fight with anyone. Was not faulting anyone. Therefore, nothing is confirmed about what you posted.

There was an opportunity for me, in the flow of the thread, to participate by noting that I've not seen any convincing evidence of the SH deaths. Not one open casket. And it is amazing what facial reconstruction can be done by funeral home personnel.

I clearly understand you did not approve of my post to another poster.