Here is where O’Reilly’s argument falls apart.
If not God is not the Supreme arbiter of right and wrong, who is?
Why is homosexuality ok, but not bestiality?
I live in a state where bestiality is legal, unless you can prove that the animal didn’t enjoy it. In other words, it’s ok as long as the animal is on top.
We have had several high profile bestiality cases and guess what, all the men involved were homosexuals, not that all homosexuals also engage in bestiality. So what’s the difference, morally, and who is the arbiter of what is moral and not moral, legal and not legal.
Should we force WA State Bestiality laws on all states, make it a federal law?
If something is legal, do you have to do it?