Skip to comments.
Boeing unveils updated F/A-XX sixth-gen fighter concept
Flight International ^
| 04/07/2013
| Dave Majumdar Washington DC
Posted on 04/07/2013 10:46:46 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Nice thought, but not exactly on topic...
21
posted on
04/08/2013 6:48:37 AM PDT
by
John Valentine
(Deep in the Heart of Texas)
To: John Valentine
Not exactly off-topic.
How are we going to build these, when all “our” manufacturing is going to China?
To: Little Pig
Boeing's entry in that contest was the x-32, which I liked because it had a maw like a pelican:
23
posted on
04/08/2013 7:02:29 AM PDT
by
PLMerite
(Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
To: TalonDJ
I don’t think the F-35 is deployed yet. Perhaps a few trainers are but it is not deployed for combat. That is still years away.
24
posted on
04/08/2013 7:40:25 AM PDT
by
jpsb
To: dalereed
what's a horrible joke is the f-35!!! On the technical/software side I've heard the project uses C++ and not Ada like the F-22 does/did. {I'm unclear as to whether the F-22 transitioned to C++ or not; I seem to remember an article talking about it because they "had difficulty" finding Ada programmers... as if the cost to training competent programers to use it was less than the cost of hiring incompetent/unwilling programmers.}
Personally I want to use a language that helps me catch stupid mistakes rather than just pass detectable mistakes into production.
25
posted on
04/08/2013 7:51:27 AM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Sparticus
That's just how long these things take. Really? How long did it take to develop and deploy an atomic bomb from a cold start?
With slide rules, chalk, and all manual machine tools?
How long should it take now with high performance computers, CAD/CAM, CNC machine tools and 3-d printers?
26
posted on
04/08/2013 8:28:54 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them.)
To: Hardraade
27
posted on
04/08/2013 8:29:54 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them.)
To: PLMerite
28
posted on
04/08/2013 8:31:47 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The Boeing F/A-XX concept is a response to a USN request for information (RFI) from April 2012 soliciting data for a replacement for the service's Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler fleets in the 2030s. Which means it will be delivered in the mid-2040's and hundreds of billions overbudget.
To: jpsb
No, not for combat yet...but very little is deployed for combat right now because we aren’t fighting anything. The training squadrons are operational and have been for a few some months now. It takes time top build up enough supply of planes and pilots. The F22 was fully operational for several years before they sent one to a war zone.
30
posted on
04/08/2013 8:52:10 AM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: null and void
A modern fighter is much more complex than an atomic bomb. You can make computers and Cad twice as fast but that does not make an engineer twice as productive.
31
posted on
04/08/2013 8:55:32 AM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: Cringing Negativism Network
They aren’t. Don’t believe everything you read.
32
posted on
04/08/2013 8:57:19 AM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: TalonDJ
Yep. And any job will expand to consume all the time and money it is allowed to.
33
posted on
04/08/2013 8:59:00 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them.)
To: jpsb
Don’t tell VMFA-121 that they don’t have any F-35Bs or that their TOE will not be at full complement by the end of CY 2013.
34
posted on
04/08/2013 9:08:19 AM PDT
by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
To: null and void
What is Mil Spec on code generation? How many lines of code were written, beta tested, reviewed, corrected and released during the Manhattan project? Any idea how many lines of code are required for each variant of the F-35?
35
posted on
04/08/2013 9:15:48 AM PDT
by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
To: wastedyears
These are probably being developed for sale to China so we can fund ObamaCare. ;)
36
posted on
04/08/2013 9:18:40 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
(CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
To: null and void
Yup. And unless we are willing to double the bill UP FRONT and have two companies compete all the way to production, then we are stuck with that. I would rather we did that. At least then the costs would ONLY double (hopefully :P).
37
posted on
04/08/2013 10:30:41 AM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: A.A. Cunningham
Millions. Several of them. And every one has to be thoroughly reviewed and tested.
38
posted on
04/08/2013 10:33:06 AM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Definately better looking.
39
posted on
04/08/2013 11:29:04 AM PDT
by
laplata
(Liberals will never get it. Their minds have been stolen.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Manufacturing fighter jets is still something we can do at home.
40
posted on
04/08/2013 3:38:00 PM PDT
by
John Valentine
(Deep in the Heart of Texas)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson