Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Secretly Deploys B-1 Strategic Bombers, E-6 "Doomsday" Planes Near North Korea
Zerohedge.com ^ | April 5, 2013 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 04/05/2013 5:28:06 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian

First the US fanfared the placement of two F-22 Raptors in the Osan airbase of South Korea. Then it demonstratively launched a B-2 stealth bomber on a training mission over a South Korean gunnery range. Then it deployed an anti-ballistic missile defense system to Guam and positioned two guided-missile destroyers in the waters near Korea. And now, courtesy of the Aviationist, we learn that the Pentagon has escalated once more in an ongoing cat and mouse game with North Korea, of who blinks first, and dispatched several B-1 ("Bone") Lancer strategic long-range bombers to Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. What is different this time, however, is that unlike the previous very public and widely trumpeted reciprocal escalation steps, this particular deployment has been kept secret from the public (at least the broader public), "a fact that could be the sign that the U.S. is not only making symbolic moves (as the above mentioned ones), but it is preparing for the worst scenario: an attack on North Korea."

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: b1; guam; northkorea; notsosecret; opsec; secret; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-206 next last
To: Former Proud Canadian

Secretly huh? Maybe I just have a bad memory, but I don’t remember so many national security leaks out of the Bush administration. The unit responsible for events such as the Bin Laden raid should never have been leaked.


181 posted on 04/06/2013 12:55:38 PM PDT by Patriot95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Patton and MacArthur...

Those two shared the same kind of leadership style --grab the headlines & strut. It's not hard to imagine that if Patton had been sent to the Pacific theater, the two would've attacked each other harder than they'd have fought Japan.  

Just the same mho is that Patton would not have been blindsided by China in Oct. '50 because he seemed to have anticipated Germany in Dec. '44.

182 posted on 04/06/2013 1:00:40 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

I am not saying that Mcarthur did not make some mistakes...war is a very hard task to general. Maybe you should try it sometime. What you did was overstate your case by saying he said it was impossible for the Chinese to get involved, and he did not...right?


183 posted on 04/06/2013 1:24:40 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

“B-1’s to Guam. Somebody is getting ready for something.”

Yes, more bread-and-circuses (like Iraq) to distract attention from the destruction of our way of life. I’ve seen too many demonstrations in South Korea afainst US troops there to really care what happens in that part of the world. If the 2 Koreas annihilate each other we’ll probably gain back some of the jobs we’ve shipped over there.

That is what my take on foreign policy has been reduced to; the real salvation would be nuclear war between India and Red China. Our unemployment would be -20%...


184 posted on 04/06/2013 2:19:51 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fabian
war is a very hard task to general. Maybe you should try it sometime.

LOL --you & Monterrosa-24 keep trying to change the subject!  We start out talking about Macarthur & y'all back off from defending his blunders and switch over to my being a bad guy. 

We see that game a lot these days, usually with those that defend Obama, Clinton, Carter, etc.  Whenever we bring up their malfeasance we get hit with "aw you could do better huh? huh? Look, my war experience may be very impressive to some but we both know that there's nothing I ever did that can excuse what Macarthur did.  I don't want to play that game & if it's that important to you they go ahead & play with it by yourself.  They say if you play with it by yourself to much it can make you blind though.

Something to note here is how we got so much more opinion on Macarthur than fact.  We don't even have a consensus on how to spell his name as Microsoft says it's "Macarthur" and the Freerepublic checker wants "MacArthur".  Go figure.

185 posted on 04/06/2013 3:25:32 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

“PS. Is it still a secret?”

Probably haven’t told Obbie yet...

(Do Not Look for a /sarc tag)


186 posted on 04/06/2013 3:43:46 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama

I did not say you are a bad guy..but you are quite presumptive..and you are the one that avoided my point that you OVERSTATED MacArthur’s error by saying that he was basically totally blid as to the Chinese situation...by saying that he said it was IMPOSSIBLE for the Chinese to get involved. You still have not shown me where he said that.


187 posted on 04/06/2013 4:52:13 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Perhaps not. I think Kimmy is still waiting for his IBM 5150 to boot up.

Then he'll have to dial-up, or...Does NK even have internet?

188 posted on 04/06/2013 6:46:47 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Gone Galt, 11/07/12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
I think Kimmy is still waiting for his IBM 5150 to boot up. Then he'll have to dial-up, or...Does NK even have internet?

No, but he's got WMD's...

189 posted on 04/06/2013 8:08:46 PM PDT by FDNYRHEROES (It's 3 AM. Let me sleep on it. I'll get back to you in 16 hours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

I saw a cool video of two Bones attacking a group Taliban in a mountain valley. They dropped a load on a convoy, swung around and bombed’em again, just for good measure. I could believe how maneuverable they were..


190 posted on 04/06/2013 9:43:20 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Constitution? What Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

They don’t need to mobilize the whole army at the same time. Do it incrementally, starting with those at the northernmost part of the country, get them to the border first, and move those progressively south, next. It’s a much smaller footprint, and more difficult to detect.

It’s smart, anyway. That’s what I would do if I was in command.


191 posted on 04/07/2013 1:41:33 AM PDT by wastedyears (I'm a gamer not because I choose to have no life, but because I choose to have many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
We all now know that it was delusional progressives HILLARY CLINTON, Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright who brokered the disasterous 'Agreed Framework' deal with North Korea (Oct. 21, 1994).

In that Agreed Framework, North Korea was GIVEN two twin, light water nuclear reactors from the U. S. - - [since Bill Clinton designated that Agreed Framework as a 'deal'...Congress had no say in it!!] Thank you Bill & Hillary Clinton (and democrats) for fully loading up North Korea with plutonium bombs!

Google: "Clinton Bankrolled North Korea's Nuke Program"

Not to mention, this proof from Albright's words herself:

Google: "FLASHBACK: Albright: North Korea 'Cheated' on Clinton Nuke Agreement"

Current Status !!

KEDO announced November 21, 2003 that it would suspend construction of the two light-water nuclear reactors in North Korea for one year beginning December 1. The suspension came in response to Pyongyang’s failure to meet “the conditions necessary for continuing” the project, according to the KEDO announcement.

.....North Korea reacted December 12 by announcing that it would restart the nuclear facilities governed by the Agreed Framework....the construction of the future light-water reactors was far behind schedule. The first reactor was initially slated for completion in 2003 but was not likely to be operational until 2008 at the earliest." (which brings us now to today, 3/31/2013)

Again, thanks Hillary and democrats; look what you've brought upon us now!

http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/agreedframework

192 posted on 04/07/2013 3:27:32 AM PDT by Mr Apple ( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/770752/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple

“What difference at this point does it make?”


193 posted on 04/07/2013 6:00:48 AM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Deploying the B-1 in response to NK provocations while at the same time cancelling a missile test to lessen tensions with NK. . . talk about mixed signals.

Who do we have in charge. . .anyone?


194 posted on 04/07/2013 6:32:40 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

Can’t carry the MOP.

Can carry lots of cruise missiles and JDAMS.


195 posted on 04/07/2013 6:33:41 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: batterycommander

Can’t carry the MOP.

Only the B-2 and the B-52 can carry that munition.


196 posted on 04/07/2013 6:34:48 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

“since a standard ferry flight of multiple planes would normally see the aircraft move individually.”

Not really.

A flight of four (or two) per tanker would be usual.

The aircraft fly in “formation” trailing the tanker and close to re-fuel when necessary, and when done re-fueling, they drop back to trail position.

You don’t fly in the contact position unless you are re-fueling and you don’t fly in close formation for long periods of time.


197 posted on 04/07/2013 6:41:23 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

Good to know, thank you!


198 posted on 04/07/2013 7:28:01 AM PDT by Old Sarge (We are officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Hulka
Yeah, but I think it is much worse than that.

This is actually a HUGE victory for North Korea. By bluster they got the USA to CANCEL a missile test. No other nation has ever been able to do that.

A tremendous show of weakness. Valarie Jarret had a hand in this. A terrible defeat for the US.

199 posted on 04/07/2013 2:22:16 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Too bad Obama wouldn’t let them carry any bombs.


200 posted on 04/07/2013 3:17:47 PM PDT by patriotsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson