[Cboldt]

From O'Mara's point of view, the best situation would have been for him to have no involvement at all with the HOA case. Not as advisor, nothing. Liberty Mutual can handle their case without any reference to whther or not Zimmerman was justified in using deadly force. The duties of the HOA are remarkably different from the right to self defense.

I do agree, his "big mouth" got him in trouble. He has no obligation to tell the media anything, and he should know that the media is as much his enemy as is the state of Florida.

[Uncle Chip]

I found this comment from someone over at TL:

Crump is establishing that he is opposing counsel, for purposes of avoiding being deposed in the criminal case. I think filing the settlement agreement is unnecessary for that purpose, as his proffer that he is counsel for the Martins and he intends to sue Zimmerman is likely sufficient to establish him as "opposing counsel" in that sense.

Wouldn't a proffer from O'Mara that he does not intend to represent Zimmerman in any such civil suit trump that Crump proffer???