Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

A little tidbit:

Crump asked that the agreement remain confidential. However, the court has decided that there is no reason for the agreement to remain confidential, and is giving Crump 10 days to appeal that decision.

We have learned, that the homeowners association’s insurance company did not have to pay out a claim on the case.

http://www.cfnews13.com/content/news/cfnews13/news/article.html/content/news/articles/cfn/2013/4/5/trayvon_martin_s_par.html


119 posted on 04/06/2013 4:42:39 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip
I noticed that too. I think Crump made a mistake in filing the civil agreement in the criminal case file. I expect Nelson will respect the desire of the parties to keep the amount of the settlement a secret. Courts routinely protect confidential information from public disclosure. The existence of the agreement is not a secret, and much of it will be legal boilerplate including agreement to not sue and to not disclose (at least some contents of) the agreement to anybody.

It would be funny if the insurance company took Crump's filing of the agreement as breach of the agreement, and sued for breach of contract.

122 posted on 04/06/2013 5:01:45 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson