Posted on 04/04/2013 10:32:38 PM PDT by Dallas59
The most probable outcome of all these tensions is a low-level "tactical" strike from North Korea.
But don't worry, it'll be " a relatively small attack that wont leave many people dead," Sue Mi Terry, a Columbia University professor who served as a senior analyst on North Korea at the CIA from 2001 to 2008, told Wired's Spencer Ackermann.
Analysts in the military, political, and intelligence fields have all pretty much said the same thing: Kim Jong-Un has painted himself into a corner, and the only way out is a gunfight.
Luckily they also say it won't be World War III.
(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...
we ought to hit them
Just give PRC and Russia a few hours notice , we are taking out North Korea , with prejudice .
Really nail them hard . No pulled punches .
As Lemay said , just bomb them into the Stone Age .
No quarter .
These people have chosen their leader , or kowtowed to him
one way or another , they’ve got to go .
No more kim chee
liberalism is a mental disorder (Michael Savage)
Oh, what’s a few !00,00 dead. We have Utopia!.
Zer0 will not retaliate. He cannot be bothered. His next vacation is a few weeks away.
I sincerely believe Zer0 wants North Korea to prevail.
Besides,53% of the people in the U.S. want subsidies. Please, no interference with
our food tamps, sect.8 housing, WIC etc.
do not believe our response to NK will be entirely up to him
According to http://www.breakingnews.com/
North Korea loads 2 medium-range missiles on mobile launchers; hides them in an unidentified facility - @YonhapNews
posted at 2:50 AM EST 3/5/13
Is this legit?
meant 4/5/13
Appears to be. I saw it on Yahoo, maybe linked from Drudge.
Nope. Maybe i saw it on twitter, i dunno. I already cleaned out my history/cache or i’d go get it again.
As long as they limit it to Los Angeles, San Francisco and maybe Seattle, I don’t have a problem with it... :)
Relative to nukes, NK’s ability to one, miniaturize, two, launch, three, make it through our strategic defenses, are very low. And if one did, the damage, again relative to nukes, would be minimal. And in a matter of hours his country would be wiped off of the face of the earth. But to allow him to develop, and build an arsenal is reckless. We will have to deal with him and the longer we wait, the more damage he can do.
If they haven’t developed a small enough warhead to fit on top of a missile, then why not build a very big warhead and stick it in a jumbo jet or the hull of a cargo ship or submarine? What, North Korea doesn’t have any cool aid drinkers to deliver such a device?
Decimal Minutes (GPS) : N38 53.86205 W77 2.19162
Decimal (WGS84) : 38.897701, -77.036527>/i>
Degrees Minutes Seconds : N 38° 53 51.723, W 77° 2 11.4972
Hope the Secret Service doesn't take that as a threat.
Here ya go:
As a bonus, here’s where he had blasted Palin for being “weak” and “self-centered”:
And the Austro-Hungarian Empire will launch only a small punitive attack on a country nobody has heard of called Serbia.
At a minimum, any missile being fueled should be destroyed on the pad. If they don't like that, destroy their nuclear research and test facilities. Decapitation strikes to follow. This cat can be declawed.
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/understanding-north-korea-and-iran?f=must_reads#ixzz2MBnGqAqR
Crazy as it seems - NKorea is willing to ‘sacrifice’ millions of its starving troops to a ‘first strike’ from SKorea.
They will have fewer mouths to feed. Led by China, Russia, Iran and others, the UN will lift sanctions on NK out of sympathy & take the opportunity to condemn SC and its allies.
This, IMHO, is what that boy king and his generals are planning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.