“If you want to do away with the military taking into consideration the needs of the married soldier and his family, then go after that, I’m not interested in fantasy.”
I don’t want to do away with the military, merely most of the Federal forces and not because I don’t honor and admire them but because we can’t afford the risk to future domestic liberty, or frankly the price tag.
In regards to the soldiers families I have nothing but the utmost of honor and admiration. I wish very much to encourage and support the procreative efforts of the men and women that risk their lives for freedom.
I simply suggest that we aut to do so more directly as to address actual procreative unions rather than wast what little resources we have left supporting dead-end(homosexual) association.
I didn’t interpret your idea as being against the military, but I know that the military must, and will continue to recognize the spouses of GIs, a job that entails living in back water places where careers and work cannot be pursued, in marriages where the husband may spend a year or more at a time away from the family while engaged in work against international enemies, where the husband is involved in work that requires his willingness to die and be maimed.
Sometimes people here just suggest things that aren’t realistic when talking about actual real life political issues, like the libertarians who think that they can explain away completely opening our nation to the world today in unlimited immigration, by combining it with a bizarre fantasy of how that would be OK and would work just fine because they would eliminate all welfare and social programs in America.