To: Dr. Brian Kopp
They could just as easily place 4-5 low yield weapons on commercial jets. Detonating them over NYC, Richmond, St. Louis, Cheyenne, and Los Angelos.
The EMP would damage over 75% of our electronics and severly restrict our ability to respond.
31 posted on
03/30/2013 4:39:56 PM PDT by
verga
(A nation divided by Zero!)
To: verga
If they hadn't thought of this idea before, they have now.
Loose lips sink ships.
To: verga
Do you think those would go undetected?
Military electronics that are critical are hardened against such attacks. You are fear mongering and incorrect.
39 posted on
03/30/2013 5:01:23 PM PDT by
EEGator
To: verga
A commercial plane flying at an altitude of 250 miles?
57 posted on
03/30/2013 5:42:58 PM PDT by
ASA Vet
(Don't assume Shahanshah Obama will allow another election.)
To: verga
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v253/chode6/chode2.gif)
at commercial altitudes the atmosphere would soak up most of the pulse... that is why it needs to be ~300mi up so ALL the energy is converted to gamma rays that cause the EMP
67 posted on
03/30/2013 7:32:25 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: verga
“The EMP would damage over 75% of our electronics and severly restrict our ability to respond. “
Not really. Try picking another number out of yer ass.
79 posted on
03/30/2013 8:19:06 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson