Replies

"Thats a far cry from a true YX-male being implanted and carrying to term."

I've long ago forgotten what I learned in school when genetics was covered. So please help!

If there are no markers for male genetics, would that maybe have consequences healthwise for the children?

What I simply meant was a human with a Y-X combination is, by genetic definition, a male and would not carry the uterus needed for gestation. If there was a X-X then that would be a genetic female, like this one, who had IT`S "plumbing" sufficiently left intact for gestation. These days, with the advances in plastic surgery and hormonal treatments, its possible to turn one, SUPERFICIALLY, into the other, BUT there would still be the issue of gestation.

The Doctor in question believed it was possible to create an "abdominal pregnancy". The olvaries are not attached to the fallopian tubes, fimbrea waves the ovum into it so in theory IF spermatozoa can unite with the ovum (extremely rare) outside of the fallopian pathway to the uterus, the blastocyst can implant into serous tissues outside of the uterus, its one of the bonifide reasons an abortion IS medically needed to save the mother`s life.

Imagine if you will, a slab of tissue, many inches long and tied into the blood supply of a major organ in the abdomen. That's what you`d have left after a full term gestational placental attachment(starts off small and grows).In the uterus, it contracts and can naturally stem the hemorrhaging, but outside? Can we say, MASSIVE internal hemorrhage? Hypovolemic shock would quickly kill the person in question.

But this is a medical condition,so can we also say "..first, do no harm...", it`s part of the Hippocratic Oath, why then would a "Medical Doctor" create a pathological condition that has a high degree of probability for killing the patient?

Sounds medically ethical to you?