“we feel that these expressed values are incongruous with the values of Johns Hopkins and deeply offensive to a large proportion of our student body.”
Even tribal societies had the awareness and common sense to keep track of their population levels. A decline in the number of women in their tribe was cause for alarm. Their leaders would react by sending out braves to steal some women (not men, mind you), from neighboring tribes, or perhaps from a passing wagon train.
Marriage between a man and a woman is necessary for the survival of any culture, even an advanced cosmopolitan society. Trivializing marriage with efforts to equate gay marriage with straight marriage is silly and destructive.
So exactly what is it about Carson’s remarks that are “incongruous with the values of Johns Hopkins”? Do they find it repugnant for one to refuse to equate gay marriage with traditional marriage? Or is John’s Hopkins criticism of Carson just empty words ?
It's pure-d Nazi repression of 7000 years of human experience with deviant sexuality.
It's delivery on the gay ranter's promise that "we will go back and affirmatively punish" dissenters who put up a good show of backbone.
Himmler would be pleased.