Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CityCenter

“Why shouldn’t I be able to marry my sister? I love her, well not in “that way,” but who is to say this is wrong? Besides, I have economic resources she needs. It’s all good. /s”

I know you have the sarc tag, but I was thinking ... for elderly siblings, between the companionship and the tax/inheritance benefits, it probably would be appealling for a lot of elderly siblings.

Remember, with SSM, the idea of marriage because you can procreate is out the window - so why restrict it to sexually active partners? Could be *any* two people.


195 posted on 03/29/2013 9:10:21 PM PDT by WOSG (REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMA. He stole AmericaÂ’s promise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG

Exactly my point. Basically there is no reason that any two people can’t marry for any reason once you take the gender restrictions away. In fact, using the arguments currently presented, there is no reason to restrict group marriages either.


197 posted on 03/30/2013 7:06:27 AM PDT by CityCenter (No matter how good your PR is, you can't outsmart the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson