Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
Here is the dissent...FULLER, C.J., Dissenting Opinion United States v. Wong Kim Ark

...how do you explain the dissenters' concern that they had just said he could be president?

Where exactly do you read that he could be President?

290 posted on 03/27/2013 6:29:22 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infay. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
Where exactly do you read that he could be President?

"Considering the circumstances surrounding the framing of the Constitution, I submit that it is unreasonable to conclude that 'natural-born citizen' applied to everybody born within the geographical tract known as the United States, irrespective of circumstances, and that the children of foreigners, happening to be born to them while passing through the country, whether of royal parentage or not, or whether of the Mongolian, Malay or other race, were eligible to the Presidency, while children of our citizens, born abroad, were not."

310 posted on 03/27/2013 8:22:36 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36
Where exactly do you read that he could be President?

Considering it starts with: Considering the circumstances surrounding the framing of the Constitution

Another attempt at a then-means-the-same-as-now analogy like you pointed out previously with Rawle, perhaps?

329 posted on 03/28/2013 5:56:31 AM PDT by MamaTexan (Please do not mistake my devotion to fairness as permission to be used as a doormat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson