Replies

I didn't have a dog in that fight, one way or another. I was not yet sexually active. Can't you read? I merely said that heterosexuals supported repeal or amendment of the laws, and stated why. No one supported letting faggots run wild. Not back then, but like I said, they were pretty low profile in those days, because the judge would have looked the other way if something happened to them.

For the umpteenth time, the law made illegal and included in definitions of "sodomy" certain acts not involving anal sex between a husband (man) and wife (woman), and those were the parts of the law heterosexuals were against. If you had read previous posts, those specific acts were spelled out.

I didn't have a dog in that fight, one way or another. I was not yet sexually active. Can't you read? I merely said that heterosexuals supported repeal or amendment of the laws, and stated why.

I keep pointing out that you are a liar, aside from the fact that you keep ignoring your lying about the 2010 pro-homosexual efforts of the Liberty Caucus in Texas in fighting the republican platform inclusion of an anti gay-marriage, sodomy clause, (see my post 157 to you), you keep making the obscene lie that it was the normal people fighting the sodomy laws because of oppression of heterosexual sex, when in reality that was the ACLU and the homosexual movement and the libertarians and the left.

As this quote shows about the sodomy laws, you don't have an honest bone in your body. ""That fight wasn't even about Libertarians, it was about getting the government out of straight people's bedrooms.""