[Norm Lenhart]

I wrote up a chapter on this for a book project. The core argument is so simple. But I have never seen it refuted.

When you strip gay marriage, indeed all ‘homosexual rights’ to the cote, it’s all based on a specific sex practice. So why not BDSM? Why not FOI? Why not Morris approved toe sucking?

Why just oral/anal/digital sex between same gender couples? I really want to see it argued.

It’s like the whole gay propaganda thing in media. I have said it and I am not the first or alone. Show the result of the two gay GQ bosybuilders in the commercial. Show one dead from aids. Show the Rosie O’Donnell lesbians having their fun on TV, not the Playboy centerfold type.

SHOVE IT IN PEOPLES FACE based on the reality. Then watch the polls. And the laws change.

[Gene Eric]

>> When you strip gay marriage, indeed all ‘homosexual rights’ to the cote, it’s all based on a specific sex practice.

Homosexual ‘marriage’ is about forcing the citizens to support and service homosexual behavior. Without sodomy, there is no component of homosexuality.

[Darren McCarty]

I think part of it is that and part of that is gender roles.

As far as the "action" goes, Sam Kinison said it best - “You basically have to make an appointment for that folks. That’s not just going to happen.”

[txhurl]

SHOVE IT IN PEOPLES FACE based on the reality.

---

I was thinking about that while dozing off. Make cardboard cutouts, painted, of both sex homos practicing what makes them worthy of global appreciation and stick ‘em in a liberals yard under cover of rain. Hopefully next to a school.