To: South40
Such an outcome would almost certainly allow gay marriages to resume in California but would have no impact elsewhere. Actually, such a ruling would also vacate the 9th Circuit decision. If the SCOTUS doesn't have jurisdiction, then neither did the 9th Circuit.
To: SeaHawkFan
Such an outcome would almost certainly allow gay marriages to resume in CaliforniaThere is no such thing as gay "marriage". It's more a bunch of gays pretending they have altered the meaning of the word.
7 posted on
03/26/2013 10:47:26 AM PDT by
South40
(I Love The "New & Improved" Free Republic!)
To: SeaHawkFan
“If the SCOTUS doesn't have jurisdiction, then neither did the 9th Circuit.”
No,the state of CA appealed prop 8 to the 9th circus.
A attorney for prop 8 supporters appealed to the USSC.
26 posted on
03/26/2013 11:59:06 AM PDT by
Beagle8U
(Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: SeaHawkFan
Actually, such a ruling would also vacate the 9th Circuit decision. If the SCOTUS doesn't have jurisdiction, then neither did the 9th Circuit. That is only true if they dismiss the case for lack of standing. In that case, they should also vacate the District court decision. How could a party have standing to defend the law at trial, but not have standing to pursue an appeal? And if there was no one with standing to defend the law at trial, there could be no trial, and thus, no ruling overturning Prop. 8.
However, if they dismiss the case for some other reason (lack of ripeness, etc), then in that case the 9th Circuit ruling would remain in effect.
42 posted on
03/26/2013 1:55:08 PM PDT by
CA Conservative
(Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson