Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brownsfan

You are assuming he is on the conservative side to begin with. I think that them stating there is no legal standing to take the case would be the best outcome we could hope for... even if it means CA gets gay marriage. They can have it.

This would be a huge loss for the LGBT, their strategy all along has been to push this to the federal level and force the judicial branch to declare gay marriage a right throughout the land. If this approach fails watch for a military member( ie federal employee ) to sue up to the feds for denial of benefits in state X when they were legally married in state Y. This is not over by a long shot.


16 posted on 03/26/2013 10:55:09 AM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: longfellowsmuse

Rust - and evil - never sleeps.


17 posted on 03/26/2013 10:58:26 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: longfellowsmuse

“even if it means CA gets gay marriage. They can have it.”

They advance, we retreat.

CA rejected Gay marriage. They should rule on this, if the SCOTUS sanctions judicial activism - the gay marriage folks will simple do this to strike down EVERY gay marriage ban in the united states through the judiciary and the people will have no say.


30 posted on 03/26/2013 12:19:51 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson