Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

1) Marriage should be a decision for the States. I do agree that these decisions need to be determined by the State Legislature.

2) The Supreme Court should not have any decision in the decisions of the States.

3) Therefore, all decision of these States are to be held supreme and not challenged by the Federal Government.

Is there NOT any decision made by the States that can be overturned by the Supreme Court these days? These days of changing attitudes seems to say YES, they can do whatever they want and adjust the Constitution as necessary.

Let us pray...or heaven help us - whatever helps these days.


4 posted on 03/25/2013 7:26:43 PM PDT by Deagle (quo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Deagle

But how would they sort out taxes and other issues if the homosexual marriage is recognized in one state and not another? I pray the court rules against homosexual marriage as a constitutional right, but I’m not optimistic.


7 posted on 03/25/2013 7:30:57 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Deagle

The entire premise of homosexuals is that their behavior is beyond their control or environment. Homosexual behavior, they propaganda, is an immutable trait.

For the court to find a “love test” in marriage requires that marriage be ONLY about adult sexual satisfaction.


29 posted on 03/26/2013 7:21:26 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson