[SampleMan]

I would not tolerate stop and frisk. Its unconstitutional.

I don’t care about how effective it is, its unconstitutional.

Stop and frisk appears to be a natural requirement, once you’ve disarmed the citizenry. The police can’t protect anyone if they only react; thus, scared defenseless citizens are OK with abusing the rights of people who might be criminals with preemptive searches.

[Moonman62]

I would not tolerate stop and frisk. Its unconstitutional. I don’t care about how effective it is, its unconstitutional.

Stop and frisk is based on a Supreme Court decision.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: I would not tolerate stop and frisk. Its unconstitutional.

Then you would not tolerate cops who give you a ticket for running a red light or going through a stop sign without proof ( only his word against yours ).

Try fighting it in court. Most of the time — YOU LOSE. The judge listens to the cops.

There goes “innocent until proven guilty”.

At least in stop and frisk, you aren’t fined for anything.