Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wolfman23601
If banning homo marriage is unconstitutional under the 14th amendment than so is the progressive income tax.

A progressive income tax is constitutional because the 16th Amendment explicitly authorizes it.

5 posted on 03/22/2013 9:01:03 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker

Wrong, the 16th amendment authorizes the income tax, but the progressive rates would violate equal protection under the law. Everyone should pay the same rate.

Not that I agree that the Constitution says that because the law is based on income so if you make $X, your tax is X% and everyone abaides by that law. Just like the marriage law is man and woman. Even gays have the right to marry someone of the opposite sex.


7 posted on 03/22/2013 9:09:18 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson