Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MBT ARJUN

Supersonic... because those boats might outrun a subsonic missile /s


12 posted on 03/21/2013 8:45:33 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

It won’t need to outrun the boats, but just the anti-missile systems protecting it.

An aircraft carrier has a snowball’s chance in Hell of being able to swat out a supersonic missile locked onto it. Imagine a rainstorm of these...


14 posted on 03/21/2013 8:55:47 PM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

They are working on a hypersonic version, also!


18 posted on 03/21/2013 9:05:35 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo
Supersonic... because those boats might outrun a subsonic missile /s

You;re almost right. Not outrun, outfight.

With a subsonic cruise missile the CIWS defence has to knock it out between 4km (when the fire control can first identifty it as a threat) and 1Km (after than, even if you destroy the guidance or flight control, the "dead" bird may still make a ballistic hit) that's about 10 seconds for a subsonic missle.

Now make the missile Mach 3. Far engagement range is the same, close engagement range moves out to 2Km. So 2/3 the engagement window at 3-4 times the speed. Time to target and hit goes down to 2 seconds.

25 posted on 03/22/2013 1:28:26 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson