[Boogieman]

"I do not understand your extreme negative reaction to Paul recognizing the unhappy but necessary need for medical abortion "where the life of the mother is involved and other things that are involved"."

It's right there in front of your eyes. There is no "unhappy but necessary need for medical abortion" for other things besides the life of the mother. Once you open that door, then you are just talking about abortions of convenience on demand, since there is no real distinction between this position and the current state of affairs.

[Casie]

Goodness! We AGREE. Only in the case of saving the mom. Paul is a doctor and most likely knows lots of rare and UNHAPPY cases that threaten the life of the mom. I know nothing about the medical field and I can think up several. (heart conditions, bleeding disorders, liver ailments, diabetes, physical injury, drug interactions...) Paul is pro-life. I am pro-life. I don't know why we are disagreeing except that you don't like Paul, and its totally cool that you don't. :p