he didn’t say that
in fact he made the point that once life begins (as is universally accepted after birth) no one treatng babies distinguishes among babies based on where they came from (ie, whether they were conceived by rape or incest)
that is a pretty good argument for protecting innocent life
"I would say that, after birth, we’ve decided that when life begins, we have decided that we don’t have exceptions for one-day-olds or a six-month-olds. We don’t ask where they came from or how they came into being. But it is more complicated, because the rest of it depends on the definition of when life comes in. So I don’t think it’s as simple as checking a box and saying, “Exceptions” or “No exceptions.”