I’m going to just ignore post 132, because we never discussed immigration nor was anything I’ve posted intended to be a commentary on immigration or Paul’s stance on it.
His pro-life stance is admirable and akin to my own. You are, however, quoting from his Senate webpage and not exactly commenting on what he said during this interview with CNN. What are you impressions on his commentary therein?
That if he would have taken a hard line stance the media would be crucifying him right now.
Like all politicians... Don’t judge by what they say, but by what they do.
What did Paul do? He penned a Senate Bill that pins the protection for life to conception. Completely guts prophylactic abortion and even extends to protecting the life of a child started under rape and incest without having to step in the tar pit the liberal media has used to torpedo other conservative politicians. The “exceptions” he mentions are the case-by-case “Mother will die” type medical procedures that no one in their right mind would rule out.
Pure. Genius.
And yet he still takes a double ration of crap here because of who his DAD is. My Dad and I disagree on a large number of things. Why would the Paul’s be any different?