You may disagree with someone, but it doesn’t make them an idiot. If you had listened to Mr. Prager for any length of time, you wouldn’t be labeling him as such.
You will notice that nowhere in the author’s disagreement did he label Dennis or his position as idiotic. Your argument was lost from the outset by usage of “idiotic” because it makes no statement as to how it is idiotic.
It’s funny, that you would probably agree with Dennis on many other issues. But it would seem that your mind is closed based on one disagreement.
I never labelled Mr. Prager - I merely described the arguments he presented in the original article.
You will notice that nowhere in the author’s disagreement did he label Dennis or his position as idiotic. Your argument was lost from the outset by usage of “idiotic” because it makes no statement as to how it is idiotic.
Those arguments were made in the original thread (to which I linked in my earlier posts) - I saw no need to rehash them here.
It’s funny, that you would probably agree with Dennis on many other issues. But it would seem that your mind is closed based on one disagreement.
Since I haven't characterized Dennis, I haven't closed my mind to anything he has to say.