Posted on 03/18/2013 5:24:21 AM PDT by IbJensen
The barbershop of the U.S. Senate has run deficits of approximately $350,000 a year for each of the last 15 years. So Senate sergeant at arms Terry Gainer has decided to try out a new model, one that has looked rather unfashionable during the Obama era: privatization.
Gainer has tried to trim Senate Hair Care Services for the past few years. Now the political climate troubling everyone else on Capitol Hill is allowing him to move faster than he anticipated towards privatizing it completely.
“I’ve accelerated my goal to get there through leveraging sequestration,” Gainer explains. “The only real way we’re going to change this thing around without pricing ourselves out of the market is by reducing the number of fulltime employees.”
The sequestration’s required spending cuts provide convenient cover. Gainer is offering early retirement to all eligible employees, hoping to replace them with independent contractors. Four employees have already accepted the offer, and they plan to retire in the next 60 days. Gainer likens these “buyouts” to those that corporations often make. He has no timeline for complete privatization, but is determined to see it through.
If previous efforts to end taxpayer funding of the Senate barbershop are any guide, it will take much longer than one might expect. According to a report from the Office of the Sergeant at Arms, Senator Paul Douglas (D-Ill.) spoke out against the federally funded barbershop back in 1951, suggesting that taxpayers need not pick up the tab for their legislators’ haircuts. Arizona senator Carl Hayden quickly rejected Douglas’s efforts, gaining support by arguing that the barbershop was an important institution passed down from the great statesmen who came before them.
A Senate barbershop that provides government-subsidized cuts, shaves, and shines is a tradition that predates the Civil War. Over the years, its legend has grown. The barbershop was thought to be more private than the cloakrooms: a place that sometimes shaped the course of human events. In 1937, the debate about President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Judiciary Reorganization Bill—the effort to pack the Supreme Court with justices favorable to the New Deal—may have forever shifted after one encounter there. According to the report from the sergeant at arms’s office,
Republican Senator Styles Bridges, an opponent of the bill, visited the barbershop to receive a shave. The barber placed a warm towel over Bridges’ face to soften his whiskers. A few minutes later, Democratic Senator Henry Ashurst, one of the bill’s defenders, bustled into the shop in search of Senator Prentiss Brown, who had remained undecided during the debate. Ashurst mistook the shrouded Bridges for Brown and, hoping to sway him, bent down close to his ear and began to whisper secrets about White House policy related to the bill. Bridges lay completely still, absorbing the information, and Ashurst left the shop deceived about Bridges’ identity. The bill suffered a 70-20 defeat in the Senate.
Rick Santorum’s proposal suffered an even greater defeat when he took on the barbershop in 1997. Senators and barbers alike were quick to object. “If you start to privatize,” intoned Arlen Specter, Santorum’s fellow Republican senator from Pennsylvania, “[y]ou put a lot of people out of a job, and you have a lot of disruptions.” Specter and his colleagues were also concerned about finding a barbershop that would cater to lawmakers’ irregular timetables. “I don’t know when you could get a haircut with our schedule around here. You can slip in and out of the barbershop in 20 minutes. If you have to go downtown, it will take an hour and a half,” Specter complained. Like Douglas’s effort before him, Santorum’s plan failed to survive a Rules Committee vote, but then-sergeant at arms Greg Casey decided to consolidate the Senate barbershop and beauty parlor anyway.
Santorum lamented the hopelessness of his attempt to battle the barbers’ influence among his comrades: “When your barber has you in the chair, and he says, ‘You’re not going to cut my job, are you?’ what are you going to say?”
Gainer has taken away the burden of persuading senators to agree. He points to the House of Representatives’ success in contracting out its barbershop’s services. House Republicans successfully privatized their taxpayer-subsidized barbershop in 1995, when they passed a resolution from then-speaker Newt Gingrich’s privatization task force. The operation had been losing $50,000 annually, according to Roll Call.
Senate Hair Care Services has cost taxpayers about $5.25 million over 15 years. They foot the bill of more than $40,000 for the shoeshine attendant last fiscal year. Six barbers took in more than $40,000 each, including nearly $80,000 for the head barber.
Gainer, who is entering his seventh year as sergeant at arms, accepts the blame, saying “shame on me” for not moving to privatize it sooner. But he adds, “I’ve tried to be more of a humanitarian than some people would like, and not just wallop everyone’s heads off at once.”
As press and politicians continue to play Chicken Little over sequestration, it’s comforting to know that at least someone in the Senate recognizes that the institution could use a trim.
SuperCuts charges $14.95 for a haircut with out a wash.
Call ahead and you will not wait. I give the girl a $20 and let them keep the change. In and out in less than 20 minutes.
Imagine the Botox Truck pulling-up with filled cylinders for Pelosi, Kerry etc, when they have appointments. The HAZMAT suits and Dr’s limos should be a dead giveaway that one of those losers has the place ‘reserved’ for their treatments.
I’ll bet those Federal barbers are the highest paid barbers in America. At least $100,000 a year. You gotta know someone to get this job
Do you get paid while you’re at the barber shop? It’s no wonder congress can’t seem to get any business done.
http://www.remingtonproducts.com/mens/Groomers/DetailTrimmers/NE3150-Nose-Brow—Ear-Trimmer.aspx
Remmington has a nose, ear AND brow trimmer for $6.99.
Do the female senators and congresswomen have a federally funded beauty shop???
I would like to know if they do and what it cost the taxpayers each year!!!!!
I haven’t been to a salon in 25 years. Hubby cuts my hair, I cut his and we both cut the dogs’. We gave one a bath at home yesterday and the other poor thing will have to endure the disgrace today - water hose bath and a blow dry with the leaf blower.
Clippers alone is difficult. You just use the clippers to trim around your ears. You can get a kit at Walmart for $30.
You use the 1" attachment for the top. 3/4" around the top. 1/2-1/4" on the side. 1/8" for sideburns... You get the idea. It's as simple as that. Takes me about 15 minutes.
I like to save the money, but mostly it's the time. Who wants to drive there, sit and wait, and listen to Lady Ga Ga?
Wonder if their hookers are government-subsidized ?.
Do the female senators and congresswomen have a federally funded beauty shop???
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Best I can find is yes however when ‘googling’ “Congressional Beauty Shop” there is no HARD FAST evidence but cited in a couple of newspaper articles, with one of the refs pointing out in 2007 a Female Congressman from OH sort of ‘demanded’ a beauty shop and ‘they’ say she lost her seat because of it.
An other article says in 1991 375,000 was spent BUT it was cited in a letter to the editor.
‘They’ want me to join the newspaper archives etc, which I won’t do so will just have to play it by ear.
That said “Would it surprise you?”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.