Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Sham

But there is no state that requires a birth certificate in order to be eligible for their state’s ballot. Arizona tried to pass such a law but Governor Jan Brewer vetoed it.
If any judge wanted to see a real-life birth certificate, all he or she need do is issue a court order for it.
I’ve only got one “handler,” not plural, “she who must be obeyed!” :-)


64 posted on 03/20/2013 7:34:23 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus
"If any judge wanted to see a real-life birth certificate, all he or she need do is issue a court order for it."

Georgia Judge Michael Malihi did just this. Obama's attorney didn't even show up in court, much less that "birth certificate". I have already PROVEN that the CONSTITUTION itself requires that a President elect prove his eligibility to Congress or Congress has to name a replacement who can prove eligibility. This doesn't require a court. It requires a Congress obeying its oath to support the Constitution. They didn't do their job. That does not make an ineligible person eligible, or legal. It makes an ineligible person who fakes being a legal President a USURPER. That's what we have.

Congressional nullification of Federal law at the top. Jury duty nullification of All Federal law at the bottom is the proper response.

65 posted on 03/21/2013 5:42:10 AM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson