[RIghtwardHo]

I was a Prosecutor for 25 years. You’d probably never make it on the jury and would be tossed if you tried it. Jury nullification is different but this approach is silly and accomplishes nothing.

And you can’t just decide you get to make the State “prove” something. That is not the way the system works. You’d have zero credibility and would be tossed out of the courtroom.

[publius911]

I was a Prosecutor for 25 years. You’d probably never make it on the jury and would be tossed if you tried it. Jury nullification is different but this approach is silly and accomplishes nothing.
And you can’t just decide you get to make the State “prove” something. That is not the way the system works. You’d have zero credibility and would be tossed out of the courtroom.

Quite the smug little toad, are you not? Delusional, too.

That's not the way the system works? The system has been perverted the same way the family has been perverted.
Believe me, when jury nullification finally vaccinates the system, you'll never see it coming!

[Uncle Sham]

"And you can’t just decide you get to make the State “prove” something. That is not the way the system works."

If I am a juror, the state HAS to prove something. In fact, they have to prove something "beyond my reasonable doubt". I have a reasonable doubt that Federal law exist anymore in this nation due to the nullification by our government of the eligibility requirements in the Constitution. They are asking me to verify that Federal law exist when they want me to act on its behalf as a juror. If they can prove it exist, beyond my reasonable doubt then I can do my duty in upholding the law. If there is no law, don't ask me to act as though there is on your behalf. That's the way the system works.