Why can’t some FReepers just agree with conservative pundits when they are right and disagree with them when they are wrong? Seems some Freepers slobber all over a favorite pundit or candidate at first but when they make a mistake or take a wrong stance on an issue they completely write them off.
I remember when Newt was a favorite, then a traitor, then the only acceptable candidate for president with some of the schizo conservative peronalities.
Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Sarah Palin, Marco Rubio, etc. are all from the Tea Party wing, are on the same side, and all support each other. Yet some posters here who favor one over the others will tear apart the others, paving the way for another candidate who will be chosen by a united GOPe establishment.
Same with pundits. Levin, Coulter, Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, etc. are all on our side yet some will completelt trash them when they are wrong on a particular issue.
The struggle within the GOP is now between the Tea Party and the old GOPe. We should reserve our fire for the Roves, Bushes, McCain’s, etc. instead of turning on those who are basically sympathetic to our cause because they have some flaws of their own.
Small factions that refuse to get along with the larger factions are doomed to allowing only milky-toast, mindless candidates to run on the Republican ticket. Since the two small factions here appear to be irreconcilable, it's best that one of them just leave.
The GOP-e having fewer ideas, should probably leave.
Marco Rubio is not “on the same side”.
He is a promoter of amnesty-by-another-name.