Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ann Archy

I want to see people publicly ask idiots like this what other sex practices deserve governmental legislation/acceptance? Why should a Homosexual get special recognition and not a hetro foot fetishist or someone into BDSM?

That is a serious question that when answered, would show the utter stupidity of the situation.


22 posted on 03/15/2013 3:35:27 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Norm Lenhart

Hey....why not THREE people MARRIED??? Why not marry your DOG or CAT??? Really....Portman is DEAD to me....I always thought he was kind of EFFEMINATE but I liked him.....ugh....he;s just like a DEMOCRAT!!


23 posted on 03/15/2013 3:37:29 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Norm Lenhart

I have used this point, only to be met with the typical liberal “that’s different!”. It’s not.

The widely accepted, traditional relationship in Western civilization has been one man committing to one woman, and trying to have children, to continue our civilization. Now, throughout our history, many people have walked outside of the normal when it comes to their sexual desires. Some men love foot-worship and bondage. Some women love rape-fantasies and spanking. Others engage in more deviant things like incest, homosexuality, bestiality, and polyamory.
Whatever you do behind closed doors, in privacy, is your own business. I not only have no right to tell two consenting adults what they can and can’t do, but I also don’t want to hear about it. It’s private. It’s deeply personal.

I don’t agree with selling these things to children as ‘normal’ or ‘desirable’. The only thing that is normal and desirable is the nuclear family, the core of our society. That is it. Having parades and public university lectures on these things is the same as public nudism. It should be covered under public indecency laws. When you step into the public arena, there is a traditional expectation that you are respectful and decent, regardless of how out-of-the-ordinary you are behind closed doors.

Liberals are all hypocrites. There are no immediate, practical reasons beyond those that apply to regular homosexuality, to oppose incestuous homosexuality. Both are taboo for the same reason. Morality. Biblical-based morality. The foundation of our society. You can’t throw centuries of Judeo-Christian tradition and ethics overboard for one group of sexual misfits, and then haul it back into the boat again for another group. It’s lunacy.


41 posted on 03/15/2013 4:53:43 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson