The only reason Taitz went there was to try to interfere with Lt. Mike Zullo’s agenda and his meetings to present his evidence to lawmakers. We knew it would happen. She wants the spotlight, just like she interjects herself in other peoples eligibility cases. This is not good.
“Taitz advised Gohmert that in January Department of Justice appeared before Judge England, stating that they represent the US Congress and on behalf of the US Congress they opposed the injunction of the certification of Obama’s electoral votes. I asked, if he as a US Congressman and member of the Judiciary committee indeed felt that it is proper for Obama to use the SSN that was not assigned to him, whether he indeed directed the US Department of Justice to represent him and oppose the injunction. Gohmert stated in front of all the reporters that he did no know anything about this and that the Department of Justice never gave him any papers.”
While Taitz has tried to horn in on all Arpaio events, in this instance she did have a case before a judge (England) at which she claims DOJ lawyers claimed to falsely represent congress. If this is true (and Taitz is often flat-out delusional and conflates/confabulates all over the place between civil and criminal procedure) then she may have gotten the attention of the representatives.
From the perspective of getting media attention, Zullo can’t compete with Taitz. Whatever her shortcomings as a lawyer and as a “person of sanity,” when she is outside the courtroom in front of the camera she does articulate the key defects in Barry’s BC, SS# and draft application in clear language.