How does unmarried sex behind closed doors "impact" "society" any more than married sex or unmarried Parcheesi?
And, to return to the original topic, how do certain unmarried sex acts "impact" "society" more than others?
And, to return to the original topic, how do certain unmarried sex acts "impact" "society" more than others?
Answer to question 1:
a) Bastard children, and hence, pathological narcissism, misery, poverty, crime, and Democrat votes.
b) Bastard adults. Perfectly performing contraception and abortion "beget" adults who believe that sex can be extracted from the general intention of faithful marriage and bearing the next generation, and exists—like one's disposable girlfriend—for the pleasure of wonderful moi. And more Democrat votes.
Answer to question 2:
More bastard adults. As with the answer to question 1, the more distantly you try to abstract sex from the possibility of procreation, the more energy you must expend in trying to convince yourself that the purpose of the world is your personal pleasure, pursued for its own sake. Since that is not the purpose of the world, anatomically impractical uses of the sex organs produce adults who are frustrated, self-centered, needy, short-tempered, and puzzled. Who mostly vote Democrat, if we're keeping score.
See Charles Murray's book, Coming Apart. Statistically, the people who most commonly describe themselves as "happy" are self-sacrificing, religious people who are married to their first spouse, and have children.