Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surface Combat Fleets: Obsolete?
The Diplomat ^ | March 13, 2013 | James R. Holmes

Posted on 03/13/2013 11:58:15 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Surface Combat Fleets: Obsolete?

By James R. Holmes

America is developing its own carrier killer. Defense Industry Daily reports that the U.S. Navy has budgeted some $198 million through 2017 to fund a sorely needed replacement for its swiftly aging RGM-84 Harpoon antiship cruise missile. The workhorse Harpoon is rapidly being overtaken by rivals such as the Indian Navy's supersonic BrahMos, which outranges the American bird by a wide margin. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency started developing a subsonic and a supersonic variant of a long-range antiship cruise missile, or LRASM, in 2009. It subsequently dropped the supersonic LRASM-B while pressing ahead with the subsonic LRASM-A. Testing will commence this year. Assuming all goes well, the navy may soon accept ownership of — and begin funding — the missile's development, manufacture, and deployment in fleet warships.

The Defense Industry Daily report speculates that budgetary woes may sink the LRASM program. That would represent a grave mistake, not to mention an awful signal to send to competitors in today's increasingly stressful maritime environment. Not only do U.S. surface combatants increasingly find themselves outranged, but the short tactical radius of contemporary naval aircraft has abbreviated the striking reach of carrier task forces. American forces must venture closer to enemy fleets or shores at the same time defenders are extending the lethal reach of their ASCMs and, in China's case, adding a panoply of other anti-access weaponry to the inventory. The LRASM's approximate 500-mile range is crucial to restore the balance of hitting power.

What does the more distant future of surface warfare hold? Suppose antiship missiles come to boast transoceanic ranges — hardly a whimsical prospect if the DF-21D pans out. Sooner or lat

(Excerpt) Read more at thediplomat.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; darpa; lrasm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: sukhoi-30mki; DoodleDawg

And I think we can all agree, lovable though they are, we don’t really want to put our missile supply chain in the hands of the Russians.


21 posted on 03/14/2013 1:49:46 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Drones can make a cheap effective anti-cruise missile defense for a ship too.


22 posted on 03/14/2013 1:57:22 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The target looks suspiciously like a Sovremenny-class destroyer. And by suspiciously, I mean perfectly rendered.
23 posted on 03/20/2013 7:38:13 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

Hey, I read hobo,...doesn’t that flight line symbol mean Danger!????


24 posted on 03/20/2013 7:41:46 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson