Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fai Mao

There aren’t enough military personnel to take over the USA even if you could get all of them to take part.


3 posted on 03/13/2013 5:09:49 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

Don’t forget unionized police and prison guards. There’re many who would have a lot to lose if they disobeyed a direct order to fire (probably including their owen lives). Don’t think for a moment the organizers behind it wouldn’t already have plans to make an example of those first few who might hesitate when the order to fire is given...


7 posted on 03/13/2013 5:15:54 PM PDT by Dubh_Ghlase (Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

But don’t forget how well armed they are. Also, there are crowd control weapons (microwave heat, sonic, and chemical weapons etc.) that have been tested and available for a while. Also, the one that controls the high ground and knows where his enemy is and his moves has the advantage. The cellular and internet networks would have to be totally dropped and unused otherwise you would be given away (location and content). Yes, when the SHTF, cut your internet cable lines, destroy your cellphones, and receive/listen only (no sending). You’ll be DF’d before you can blink...


11 posted on 03/13/2013 5:25:34 PM PDT by Dubh_Ghlase (Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

no.

but what he is doing is outline in Freedom From War, state dept publication 5277. he’s building an interal security force and ramping down the external military to be more under control of the un/international community.

i believe he’d call the un troops in if needed. and i believe he is removing commanders who would not work under the un/international command.


27 posted on 03/13/2013 5:47:05 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek
Legacy Studies in Vietnam revealed that in any given firefight, about a third or more of US troops did not fire their weapons at the enemy. Effective troops would likely be even more hard to find when ordered to fire on fellow Americans.
40 posted on 03/13/2013 6:00:44 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

“There aren’t enough military personnel to take over the USA even if you could get all of them to take part.”

They don’t need to. There are plenty of Americans willing to wear a nice pretty uniform and be a Block Captain, in charge of a single apartment complex or a neighborhood block. If they can’t control you through fear and intimidation, they can call their military overlords and have you killed. It worked in the Soviet Union, China, and Nazi Germany. It would EASILY work here, too.

Of course, those places didn’t have a pissed off population that is well trained and armed, so I suspect those block capatins would perish rather quickly.


69 posted on 03/13/2013 7:52:22 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson