Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

It was claimed that the government will not start a war against the American people BECAUSE “WE” were to heavily armed. My statement was pointing out that the government, technologically speaking at the very least, outguns the American people, and thus are NOT worried about starting a shooting war against “WE”. YOU insinuated that I was foolish for thinking this as a possibility. I never claimed that “WE” would cower against the government, but that the government will not fear starting a shooting war. If you believe “WE” are immune to the possibility of our own government engaging “WE” militarily, then you have deluded yourself. There are members of the “GOP” who are not friends to the American people. Is that inaccurate? Very few in the DemocRAT party are friends to Americans. Is that inaccurate? The military firepower that this government has at it’s disposal is/can be devastating to the American people, with little reciprocity on our side. Is that inaccurate? A drawdown in military forces does NOT mean that this government is less likely to use force against “WE”. The American people being up against a tyrannical government Hell bent on subjugation of “WE” places the American people at risk. Is this inaccurate? The fact that my views have been sumarily dismissed as impossible was the denigration. The fact that this government cannot be trusted is real, and should not be derrided. You’re free to have any view you care to have, about the realities of the world we live in today, or about me. I’m finished with this.


46 posted on 03/12/2013 5:14:58 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: SoldierDad
It was claimed that the government will not start a war against the American people BECAUSE “WE” were to heavily armed.

Not by me.

47 posted on 03/12/2013 5:16:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SoldierDad
YOU insinuated that I was foolish for thinking this as a possibility.

I already proved that that was a lie. I insinuated nothing.

48 posted on 03/12/2013 5:18:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SoldierDad
If you believe “WE” are immune to the possibility of our own government engaging “WE” militarily, then you have deluded yourself.

I never said anything of the kind.

49 posted on 03/12/2013 5:19:08 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SoldierDad
I’m finished with this.

Not if you continue to drag this to other threads, lie about me and fail to ping me.

50 posted on 03/12/2013 5:20:26 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson