[dennisw]

The complaint (in part) states: The State of New Jersey vs. Eileen B. Hart -"The Defendant was yelling and screaming and making the threatening comment. "If the door is locked. I'll be back with a gun." Ms. Hart denies she ever made this statement, as does her husband, Keith. However, this is how the complaint was written up by Clayton County Sergeant J. Dick- who, it may be noted, was not present during the meeting.

This means the lying leftist punk is going to make her spend a few thousand on a lawyer while the lying leftist punk incurs no expenses. He just sics the police and court system on her and her husband. The police are often brain dead and robotically take the side of the first person making accusations (however unfounded)  in a dispute. Person B has to pay lawyers to get exonerated while accuser A just kicks back and laughs. Even if the accuser A is the real culprit... happens all the time

[AppyPappy]

My gut is that she is guilty. There are too many witnesses present for it to be a total fabrication. It’s hard to get that many people to all make up the same story.

[PapaBear3625]

Person B has to pay lawyers to get exonerated while accuser A just kicks back and laughs. Even if the accuser A is the real culprit... happens all the time

Like I said in #5: her lawyer needs to find out the name of the complainant, and sue for libel and making a false statement. If the complainant was anonymous, then that is a real issue, since that means that anybody can get anybody into trouble with police by making false accusations, and the system needs to be changed.