Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw

The implication in the threat was that she said it in the public meeting. “If you lock the doors, I’ll come back with a gun. “

The idea that some nameless faceless entity made an accusation probably wouldn’t cause the reaction of the police. If there were numerous witnesses, it would cause the reaction. The article is written to cause a specific conclusion by the reader. And it seems to have worked.


14 posted on 03/11/2013 8:25:39 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
"The idea that some nameless faceless entity made an accusation probably wouldn’t cause the reaction of the police".

Are you serious? The police were waiting for her when she got home from the meeting. There is no way they got to the meeting place and interviewed enough witnesses to determine if actual threats had occurred before she was arrested.

19 posted on 03/11/2013 8:57:27 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy

Where she lives it takes one wacka-doodle (who maybe has friends in the local PD) to make an extreme accusation (and lie his butt off) to get 5 police cars sent to her house. That’s what I think took place


21 posted on 03/11/2013 9:12:16 AM PDT by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing --- Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson