Right -- an incident that no one knew about until the victim came forward 10 years later.
You have to prefabricate better than that.
As part of the investigation, authorities went back and took a second look at a report filed to Penn State police in 1998 that alleged Sandusky inappropriately touched a 12-year-old boy as they showered together during a tour of the football locker room.
Yep, I’m wrong.. they knew in 1998 not 1999.
There is no plausible deniability for ANYONE at Penn State post the internal investigation in 1998.
The aplogists for JoePa and Penn State are despicable..
Might want to check
http://blogs.post-gazette.com/scandal/timeline.php
before you keep digging your hole.
“1998 - May 4
Senior Vice President for Finance and Business Gary Schultz is notified of investigation. In confidential notes, he writes the following about Sandusky: “Behavior — at best inappropriate @worst sexual improprieties” and “At min — Poor Judgement.” Later, he writes: “Is this opening of pandora’s box? Other children?”
That’s Administrations reaction to the INTERNAL INVESTIGATION!!!
You and others trying to argue that these folks didn’t cover up for this guy is beyond idiotic. By 1998 it was clear they knew, there is no more plausible deniability left.