Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DustyMoment

There was no stealth in resupply of Ft. Sumter. Rather, Lincoln had corresponded with the governor of SC, to notify him, and Lincoln had out of good will, limited supplies to non-lethal items.

Based on that, SC fired on the ship and the fort.


326 posted on 03/11/2013 11:08:48 AM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: donmeaker
There was no stealth in resupply of Ft. Sumter.

Not true. Lincoln leased a merchant cargo ship, NOT a US Navy ship to attenpt to bring supplies to Ft. Sumter. If this was an open attempt to resupply the fort, why would he use a merchant ship? The use of the merchant cargo ship was a stealth attempt to resupply the fort.

The South Carolinans suspected the ruse, fired on the ship and forced it back to sea. The tactic is the same one employed by the British in WW1 with the Lusitania sinking. The Lusitania was a passenger that was carrying munitions in violation of existing treaties at the time and the Germans sank her.

What Linclon tried to do was use an average looking commercial merchant ship to carry supplies to the Union soldiers at Ft. Sumter.

Since SC had already joined the Confederacy, they were trying to get the soldiers to leave the fort and previously requested them to do so; orderly and peacefully. And, since they refused the request they were surrounded and prevented from being re-supplied by Lincoln.

332 posted on 03/11/2013 11:39:17 AM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for anti-American criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson