Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RaceBannon

>> FOR LEGAL DOPE!
>> FOR LEGAL HOOKERS!

This is often the argument used against libertarians which should really be directed at the Libertarian Party and the liberals that own it.

Rand Paul’s version of libertarianism, as in small govt, doesn’t necessitate the depravity encapsulated in “Legal Dope and Hookers” as far as I’m concerned.

We all should understand the difference between statism and libertarianism along with the impact these enforcement factors have on morality.


34 posted on 03/10/2013 6:43:16 AM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric; BarnacleCenturion; RaceBannon; Vinnie

I am a “L”ibertarian yet strong pro-Defense and appreciate the moral arguments of the pro-Life view.

“Drugs and hookers” are not a concern of mine and I believe those are states’ rights’ decisions.

Rand Paul’s views, basically.

Is there ANY ROOM for us in GOP? If the answer is “no,” then good luck with your party’s survival / growth.


87 posted on 03/10/2013 1:40:34 PM PDT by 4Liberty (Some on our "Roads & Bridges" head to the beach. Others head to their offices, farms, libraries....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson