Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives, Republicans and Self-Inflicted Wounds
Townhall.com ^ | March 10, 2013 | Derek Hunter

Posted on 03/10/2013 5:51:44 AM PDT by Kaslin

Circular firing squads are about as helpful as they sound, yet they are something at which some Republicans excel. I do my best to avoid engaging in them. To paraphrase President Reagan, my 80 percent friend is not my 20 percent enemy. But sometimes my 80 percent friends do something 100 percent stupid, and pretending they didn’t could cause more damage than calling them out on it.

Consider Sen. John McCain. Few have honed their circular firing squad skills to the level of the senior Senator from Arizona. McCain fancies himself a lot of things – a conservative, a leader, a “maverick.” But mostly he’s an insecure egomaniac more interested in Sunday show bookings and favorable media coverage than adhering to principles.

On Wednesday, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., engaged in an epic 12-plus-hour filibuster to demand an answer on domestic drone use against American citizens while a dozen Republicans, including McCain, dined and played footsie with President Obama. When the filibuster ended, Sen. Paul got from the administration something few Republicans or even journalists have been able to – an answer.

Through his actions, Paul not only got the Obama administration to commit something to paper they were reluctant – if not unwilling – to admit, he also reinvigorated the grassroots and engaged people in a way the party hasn’t been able to do with hundreds of millions of dollars spent on campaigns. He got disinterested young people to pay attention, to question a president that largely hasn’t, if even for half a day.

For this, Sen. Paul was rightly praised by people across the political spectrum.

But this wasn’t good enough for Sen. McCain, who is not known to enjoy sharing the spotlight.

The next day, with the political world still abuzz from Paul’s actions, McCain couldn’t help but criticize him.

McCain, a man who could be counted on to routinely attack the Bush administration as guilty of torture for pouring water up the nose of three, count them – THREE, of the world’s most despicable terrorists, thought Paul “ill-informed” to think any president ever would use armed drones against Americans on U.S. soil. To think the worst of a president in one case and assume the best of another, and all future others, in another case is intellectually inconsistent, to put it mildly.

But McCain was not alone in his hypocrisy, as he rarely is. His “mini-me,” presidential dining partner and devout clone in all things critical of his own party, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., was right there with him. The next two days saw Sens. Mutt and Jeff avail themselves of every possible opportunity to try to devalue what Sen. Paul accomplished.

They failed, and lowered their stature in all eyes but that of the media, which was their target audience in the first place. So while they attempt to undo smart gains made by a man working from principle, these two will warm themselves in the glow of camera lights. If it’s good for McCain and Graham, it’s bad for conservatism. But at least we have a fresh reminder of their self-interest-driven personalities and a stark contrast and an actual leader in Sen. Paul. All in all, it’s a fair trade.

CPAC

The Conservative Political Action Conference gets under way again this week in Washington. But why?

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich wondered this week what purpose CPAC serves anymore, and I can help but join him.

CPAC was once a must-attend event for conservatives, a venue where new ideas and leaders emerged. Today it’s a showcase of irrelevancy.

Yes, emerging party leaders are slated to speak, but the panels promise to be lame rehashes. Aside from marquee speakers, many of whom have spoken in the past, there’s very little to excite the grassroots or attract new, young participants, and even less to include them. I’ve been attending CPAC for 10 years, and if they simply replayed speeches and events from my first one this year, I’d be hard-pressed to notice the difference.

This “sameness” ignores the reality of the dynamic nature of the conservative movement.

I’m no policy fan of much of what Gov. Chris Christie, R-N.J., has done, but to deny his success is, quite simply, stupid. What he can teach activist and politicians alike is his plain-spoken communication skills, something our side lacks like the moon lacks oxygen. Think what you will of Christie, but he knows how to handle the media, something conservatives desperately need. But the CPAC board would have none of it.

They’d also have none of GOProud, the fiscally conservative gay group. Jimmy LaSalvia, co-founder and executive director of the group (and a good guy and friend) is participating on a panel put on by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, but GOProud isn’t allowed to sponsor or have a booth. Why? Because it supports gay marriage. I don’t because I don’t support the redefinition of words based on political correctness, but I support GOProud’s right to and welcome its support. Votes, by the way, we need if we are to stand any chance of righting our fiscal ship before we hit the coming Greece-berg we’re speeding towards.

But the CPAC board doesn’t want those votes or that money. I, for one, didn’t realize we were flush with both to the point we could cast off some without concern, but then I’m just going by the 2012 election results.

That a group of people who agree with the CPAC board 99 percent of the time would be excluded over an issue the federal government should have no role in is absurd. Inclusion of GOProud, which has happened in the past, is not an embrace of the areas where there are disagreements; it’s an embrace of the areas where there is agreement. If people aren’t interested in the support and votes of a group because they are bothered by what they do with their genitals, they have too much time on their hands and need a hobby.

They also need a brain.

The only time CPAC has made the news this year is through the stupidity of its actions. Headlines about refusing to invite Gov. Christie and excluding GOProud, but inviting progressive MSNBC host Chris Hayes (who garnered more headlines by rejecting it over GOProud’s exclusion) and Donald Trump (a great businessman but more of a self-promoter than noted conservative) exposes the CPAC board as an organization in need of some new blood.

I’m happy to wage the battle between the various factions within the conservative movement, but not until we vanquish liberalism. We, and the cause of liberty, would be much better served showcasing that which unites us than that which divides us. Continually reloading our opponent’s quiver with arrows is folly. Unfortunately it’s also something at which we excel.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: chrischristie; cpac; filibuster; goproud; johnmccain; randpaul; republicans; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2013 5:51:44 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A fact of life is: When republicans engage in acts of torture it is wrong. When democrats engage in acts of torture is is OK. Got it?


2 posted on 03/10/2013 5:59:21 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The whole point is to ultimately get more votes or our guys than the other side gets ~ and in single member districts there are only ever going to be two major poles of politics ~ or one if you are infiltrated by commies or criminals (see: Democrat party).

Gay voters will follow the money. Our traditionalists do not vote for Republicans if they perceive that the party, or a major part of the party, has gay leadership. With the traditionalists making up the majority of the party's supporters, and also making up most of the various Conservative coalition partners, there would seem to be no reason whatsoever to bring Christie or the gay crowd onto the stage for a round of applause.

3 posted on 03/10/2013 6:09:10 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You wrote: The whole point is to ultimately get more votes for our guys then the other side gets

You are so right with that. The problem is that our side is so divided that we do not have a chance.

The only way we can win is when we are united. This is something I have been preaching for several years, but no one wants to listen :(

4 posted on 03/10/2013 6:17:34 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The next two days saw Sens. Mutt and Jeff avail themselves of every possible opportunity to try to devalue what Sen. Paul accomplished.

I suspect that Mutt & Jeff were getting ready to announce some great compromise/surrender with Obama when Paul stole the spotlight.

5 posted on 03/10/2013 6:19:01 AM PDT by oldbrowser (They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

This is quite an accomplishment...to be so right and so wrong simultaneously.


6 posted on 03/10/2013 6:20:05 AM PDT by MestaMachine (Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; muawiyah
The only way we can win is when we are united. This is something I have been preaching for several years, but no one wants to listen :(

You are right, we are divided, but divided not along superficial or non-important lines and ideas, but along the very bedrock of principles.

We are divided along the principles of rule of law(Amnesty for Illegal Aliens), the Gay Agenda, Abortion, and the concept and principle of limited government.

All of which, is non-negotiable from a conservative's point of view.

All of which, the GOP-E and money people are against.

So there really is no ground for compromise but simply a fight, a "War" for control of the message and ultimately, the leadership of the party.

We either win this war, or the GOP goes the way of the WHIGS.
7 posted on 03/10/2013 6:27:55 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; muawiyah
This is quite an accomplishment...to be so right and so wrong simultaneously.

Care to share what you believe to be so wrong with Muawiyah's post?
8 posted on 03/10/2013 6:29:19 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We got out more people to vote for Mitt than for McCain, but we fell way short of the Bush high water mark!

What has been missing since George Bush last ran is a major Republican voter registration drive.

I gather the fear was the leftwingtards thought we'd get all these new Conservatives registered and vote down their boy in the primaries, so it didn't happen.

The new registrations have to be gotten in the Spring during the primaries when there's a lot of public interest in politics or you just don't get them. Screwing around with the primary like the Mittbots did in Virginia makes it look like the Democrats have taken over anyway and that tends to discourage voters.

Teach the people there's no sense showing up for a primary and they'll not show up for the general election either ~

9 posted on 03/10/2013 6:33:02 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The only way we can win is when we are united.

I like that quote from Reagan about the 80% friend not being my 20% enemy. It succinctly describes our problem.

We need to get over judging who is 100% "true conservative" and who is just a "RINO". Ever since the wordsmiths at democratic troll central introduced these concepts, we have been at war with ourselves.
Conservatism is a process of evolution and some people never get to the 100% mark. It's no reason to exclude them.

10 posted on 03/10/2013 6:37:30 AM PDT by oldbrowser (They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
The Whigs didn't disappear ~ their party structure disappeared ~ they stuck around and are with us yet. Except for their highway lobby they show up as Fiscal Cons. That might also explain the otherwise undeserved popularity off the Libertarians.
11 posted on 03/10/2013 6:45:52 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
We need to get over judging who is 100% "true conservative" and who is just a "RINO". Ever since the wordsmiths at democratic troll central introduced these concepts, we have been at war with ourselves.

So, from a conservative perspective, where do we draw the line for withholding support from a potential Presidential candidate?

Which issue, combination of issues, or number of issues are you really willing to sacrifice for a win?

1. Abortion?
2. Gay Marriage?
3. Amnesty?
4. Limited, constitutional Government?




12 posted on 03/10/2013 6:46:44 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; muawiyah

No, no, no. Didn’t mean muawiyah’s post. Meant the article.


13 posted on 03/10/2013 6:48:26 AM PDT by MestaMachine (Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The Whigs didn't disappear ~ their party structure disappeared ~ they stuck around and are with us yet. Except for their highway lobby they show up as Fiscal Cons. That might also explain the otherwise undeserved popularity off the Libertarians.

True, but they never were in power again. They never were able to move an issue forward again.

Your principle could also be applied to the Democrats, who are just short of being actual Communists (Some actually are) and the GOP-E, which are actually now Democrats, but not the old-time conservative kind.
14 posted on 03/10/2013 6:49:42 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
No, no, no. Didn’t mean muawiyah’s post. Meant the article.

Thanks for the clarification, sorry for my obtuseness.
15 posted on 03/10/2013 6:50:17 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Right on mccain and graham, VERY wrong on the rest. In fact, mccain and graham are prime examples of what you get when the second half of his article comes to pass.


16 posted on 03/10/2013 6:53:08 AM PDT by MestaMachine (Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I certainly agree with you The only way we can win is United.
My only problem is uniting behind a POS aint my bag.


17 posted on 03/10/2013 6:55:07 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Abe Lincoln himself had been a Whig ~ and a railroad lawyer to boot ~ and after the Civil War several more former Whigs were Presidents.


18 posted on 03/10/2013 6:57:00 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Abe Lincoln himself had been a Whig ~ and a railroad lawyer to boot ~ and after the Civil War several more former Whigs were Presidents.

True, but as you state, they were former Whigs.
19 posted on 03/10/2013 6:59:36 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

McCain and Lindsay know the young Turks are rising. In order to hang on to their perks and power, they would rather side with those on the opposite spectrum than give an inch to those who can (and will) make a difference.


20 posted on 03/10/2013 7:11:31 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever ((Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson