Skip to comments.
Gabby Giffords' husband (Mark Kelly) buys AR-15
Breitbart ^
| 3/9/13
| AWR Hawkins
Posted on 03/09/2013 4:34:25 PM PST by pacificpundit
Mark E. Kelly, gun-control proponent and husband to former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, recently purchased an AR-15 (an "assault weapon," he called it)which he now says he intended as an illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws.
Kelly reportedly bought the AR-15 and a 1911-style semi-automatic pistol at Diamondback Police Supply in Tucson, Arizona.
Various sources contacted Breitbart News once Kelly made the purchase, and after we began investigating the details surrounding the purchase, Kelly announced on his Facebook that he was not going to keep the AR-15, which he has yet to pick up from the store.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: ar15; arizona; banglist; demagogicparty; giffords; guncontrol; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: pacificpundit
2
posted on
03/09/2013 4:37:25 PM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Got a problem? Nothing a drone strike can't fix.)
To: pacificpundit
I just had a background check a few days ago when I went to my local gun store to buy a .45. As I was leaving, I noticed a used AR-15. Bought that too. Even to buy an assault weapon, the background check only takes a matter of minutes. I don't have possession of it yet but I'll be turning it over to the Tucson PD when I do.
I fail to see what he intends to prove. That it only takes a few minutes to fill out the paperwork on a background check?
3
posted on
03/09/2013 4:37:26 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: cripplecreek
I don't have possession of it yet but I'll be turning it over to the Tucson PD when I do.Then why buy it? Tucson PD doesn't have the money to buy their own?
4
posted on
03/09/2013 4:40:00 PM PST
by
umgud
To: cripplecreek
“I fail to see what he intends to prove.”
1) He has too much money.
and
2) He’s an a-hole.
5
posted on
03/09/2013 4:40:34 PM PST
by
Carriage Hill
(AR-10s & AR-15s Are The 21st Century's Muskets. Free Men Need Not Ask Permission!)
To: pacificpundit
...he now says he intended as an illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws. Most child porn addicts usually tell the court that they have it on their computer for "research" purposes only. Kelly is a sleaze.
6
posted on
03/09/2013 4:40:47 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Progressive, Marxist liberals do not evolve, they morph into fascists.)
To: pacificpundit
Hammers kill more people than “assault Rifles” so it is a good thing he did not buy a hammer.
7
posted on
03/09/2013 4:40:49 PM PST
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: pacificpundit
he intended as an illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws.Is he admitting to having a criminal background? Otherwise, if his record is clean, then the system worked just fine.
8
posted on
03/09/2013 4:41:09 PM PST
by
kevao
(.)
To: cripplecreek
Now you KNOW he was gonna keep these suckers just like I said he would back when he was ‘testifying’ against them. Said he would have him one in the very near future and voila. BUT he was busted for the effing hypocrite that he is before he could play with his new toy.
9
posted on
03/09/2013 4:45:14 PM PST
by
MestaMachine
(Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
To: pacificpundit
Is this the same Mark E Kelly that's named in the article?
Exactly what did he do where he shouldn't have bought a M4 rifle and a 1911?
To prove what???
10
posted on
03/09/2013 4:46:31 PM PST
by
BCW
(http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
To: pacificpundit
He is exercising his right to keep and bear arms. Good.
11
posted on
03/09/2013 4:46:43 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?)
To: BCW
12
posted on
03/09/2013 4:47:16 PM PST
by
BCW
(http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Pete Townsend was just researching Kiddie porn.
To: FlingWingFlyer
Exactly what I was thinking. “I only had the child porn to make a point about how easy it is to find! I’m not a pedophile!”
To: pacificpundit
They told us the Brady Bill background check was the stringent new law.
Progressive laws always progress to tyranny.
To: pacificpundit
Let me get this straight.. We need “more stringent gun laws” so people like him won’t be able to buy them? What is he trying to tell us?
To: BCW
Maybe he should exercise his right to go after the left-wing nutbags that would target his wife.
17
posted on
03/09/2013 4:51:22 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?)
To: pacificpundit
...and a 1911-style semi-automatic pistol ...He bought a 102 year old pistol? :-)
18
posted on
03/09/2013 4:51:28 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
To: MestaMachine
You know, I don’t want to say anything ugly about these people, especially considering one of their libturd bretheren shot the hell out of that woman, but I can’t keep my mouf shut.
Hey Asstronaut, stick to space travel and leave the firearms to those of us who respect them. And while you are at it, have a big cup of STFU.
19
posted on
03/09/2013 4:51:55 PM PST
by
West Texas Chuck
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. That should be a convenience store, not a Government Agency.)
To: pacificpundit
"What, haven't you seen a hypocrite before?" - Mark Kelly
20
posted on
03/09/2013 4:53:34 PM PST
by
SpaceBar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-128 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson