Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
You really are a troll, and evidently a stalker as you continue to try to make this thread related to past threads in some strange personal vendetta.

Sort of like with you and Mitt Romney?

It wasn't men promoting divorce and sexual liberation of females, and the end of gender roles and the destruction of the family, that was all the creation of the women's movement and the beginning of the gender gap in voting.

C'mon. Hugh Hefner? Ring a bell?

Read the history of the New Left. That wasn't a women's movement. For all it's support for sexual liberation, it pretty much had contempt for women.

Feminists did push for no-fault divorce, but it wasn't some thing women created or most women supported or benefited from. No fault was the result of a strange alliance of left, right and center Source.

The mythology now is that you can pick enemies who are responsible for everything that went wrong. The reality is that things were more complicated than that and responsibility more widespread.

165 posted on 03/10/2013 1:24:23 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: x

You seem confused and totally mixed up on this thread, Mitt Romney for instance isn’t a freeper, he doesn’t post here, no one stalks him.

Hugh Hefner bigger than the radical leftist women’s liberation movement and Margaret Sanger, no, me not remembering the history unfolding before my eyes and in my reading in my life, no.

I have the largest feminist library that I have seen in a home including the many lesbian and feminists homes that I have been in, although it is mostly packed away now. I used to subscribed to MS and my favorite feminist book is S.C.U.M., I unknowingly cured the president of a university NOW chapter, she showed me her hand and told me that she had removed the NOW ring and resigned her presidency because of changes in her thinking, because of me.

I remember a little about the reality and history of the left’s most successful movement and one which is all woman.

You are being silly and anti-female to pretend that women were the victims and bystanders in the results of their own glorious emergence into political equality in the world, and don’t deserve credit for their own accomplishments and decades of hard work.

I think that you must be female yourself, it didn’t take long for the left to figure out how to appeal to women, to learn how to use the female traits to move both parties to the left, today when we vote for a republican, we know that we are voting for democrat lite, because frankly, American politics has been feminized, never to return to normal.

If you had the power to turn all voting over to one sex or the other for a 50 year shakeout period and with all campaigning taking place in closed sites so that the other sex couldn’t hear the language used and the arguments made and the issues that those voters naturally gravitated to and chose to focus on, and hear the proposed solutions to what seem like intractable problems today, to to see if we could get things back on track within 50 years, which sex would you choose to be those voters?


168 posted on 03/10/2013 4:45:37 PM PDT by ansel12 ( August 29,2008 A Natural Born Reformer inadvertently unleashed within palace walls, change ensues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson