Those women might have “ruled” but they ruled the same society that came before them.
So its hardly a good example.
What happens if women owned and controlled everything for 1,000 years? What if countries came to be called Queendoms and princesses inherited them, not princes. What would the world look like then?
I think it’d probably be frightening, personally.
Sure, and any notion that women ever could rule the world will have to do precisely that. Any complete redesign of the entirety of human history under an alternate hypothesis is tautological; it will achieve whatever the premises allow and no other. That is precisely what is wrong with political theories such as Marxism - the "would" that never happens under real-world conditions. There is only one practical test for such a model, and that is the real world.
So its hardly a good example.
To which I answer that it's the only possible example. The rest is fairy dust. Best to you.