Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leon Panetta's Memorial Comment Stirs Debate (Blames Sexual Assault in the Military)
NBC Bay Area ^ | Friday, Mar 8, 2013 | Kimberly Tere

Posted on 03/08/2013 8:16:00 PM PST by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2013 8:16:00 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Panetta who made sexual assault in the military more likely?


2 posted on 03/08/2013 8:18:44 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“People look the other way” when a black Marxist Muslim gay illegal alien uses fraudulent documents to gain the office of POTUS, too.


3 posted on 03/08/2013 8:26:40 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
“I think it’s time to take this problem away from our military leaders and put it in the hands of independent prosecutors and investigators who can manage this without worrying about the impact or the reputation of the military," Hillman said.

Another "crisis" which, however, peripherally related, we must not let go to waste. This will ultimately also be the way the Second Amendment gets destroyed, just as American industrial capacity has: through "do-gooder" legislation which further empowers the Plaintiffs Bar.

4 posted on 03/08/2013 8:26:49 PM PST by FredZarguna (I ride around nights mostly...subways, buses...If I'm gonna do that I might as well get paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
“We do know that he had a history of sexual violence both in and out of the military, and for whatever reason, people somehow always look the other way,” Panetta said. “At some point, somebody pays a price,” Panetta said.

I hate to defend that fat sack of commie dog vomit but what part of what he said isn't true? He didn't single out the military he said "both in and out of the military" this Goulet scumbag was let off easy. Apparently true. Panetta said "somebody pays a price" which is also apparently true here too. This predator wasn't dealt with so he moved up from rape to murder.

5 posted on 03/08/2013 8:41:40 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Democratic Strategist’s Shocking Claim: Women Don’t Need Guns for Self-Defense, Just Tell Men ‘Not to Rape Women’
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/05/democratic-strategists-shocking-claim-women-dont-need-guns-for-self-defense-just-tell-men-not-to-rape-women/


6 posted on 03/08/2013 8:45:23 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Maybe Panetta needs to propose a new poofter medal to proudly wear on your uniform chest:

A bronze bent over “V”, with tight buttocks; adorned by bronze flying toilet paper; hanging from a brown ribbon!


7 posted on 03/08/2013 9:49:52 PM PST by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I hate to defend that fat sack of commie dog vomit but what part of what he said isn't true? He didn't single out the military he said "both in and out of the military" this Goulet scumbag was let off easy. Apparently true. Panetta said "somebody pays a price" which is also apparently true here too. This predator wasn't dealt with so he moved up from rape to murder.

You are not defending him -you are defending delusional premise that supports leftist ideology. The perp plea bargained -no one looked the other way. As well the whole 'victim' and 'abuse' leftist ideology that gives as such things as hate crime, hate speech, violence against women laws and on and on is based upon false correlations. Just because one rapes does not mean they will murder -just because one verbally 'abuses' doe not mean one will physically abuse. Get it? The whole leftist victim protection racket is based upon lies. LIES that Panetta promotes.

8 posted on 03/09/2013 12:43:41 AM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

“The perp plea bargained”

Which is precisely the point and the problem regarding implementation of the UCMJ. But hey its all a leftwing conspiracy right? - rolls eyes -


9 posted on 03/09/2013 5:18:36 AM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Panetta is shooting off at the mouth.

I wonder if Panetta (or anyone else) bothered to look into the reason why the military was unable to go forward with prosecuting this guy with the sexual assault(s). They opted to give him a dishonorable discharge in exchange for dropping charges for some reason. They don’t take sexual assault lightly.


10 posted on 03/09/2013 6:11:05 AM PST by submarinerswife (Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

There really is rape of men and women in the military. Porn and it’s humanist “ethics” are king in some circles. There really are people up the chain of command who do nothing about it because they like it - are perverted. That is not alright and has to be addressed. This is especially true now that the military have sexually released aggressive homos from the closet.

You are correct in your observation of what leftists will do with this problem. They will try and make heterosexual men into victims of gay mafia overlords. They will falsely accuse people who are uppity with their advancement and their sexual and radical cultural dictates - political correctness.


11 posted on 03/09/2013 8:34:46 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Tell me this, you friggin’ moron, how am I defending plea bargaining?


12 posted on 03/09/2013 12:04:42 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Tell me this, you friggin’ moron, how am I defending plea bargaining?

You missed entirely the point I was attempting to convey.

13 posted on 03/09/2013 3:34:17 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

No, I got your point. This guy was accused in multiple situations of rape and ended up murdering two cops but it was just a big coincidence. There was no connection. He was a nice guy until he was a murderer. He probably snapped because of those false rape allegations. He was just another Dorner who was oppressed by the system.


14 posted on 03/09/2013 3:38:02 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Which is precisely the point and the problem regarding implementation of the UCMJ. But hey its all a leftwing conspiracy right? - rolls eyes -

.and if he was punished to the full extent possible he would not have later murdered as Panetta suggests? How about as Panetta implies he was destined to be murderer because he was sexually .violent' and we should accept this 'fact. in how we write and apply laws? Punish people for future crimes?

You gettin it yet?

15 posted on 03/09/2013 3:39:45 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
No, I got your point. This guy was accused in multiple situations of rape and ended up murdering two cops but it was just a big coincidence. There was no connection. He was a nice guy until he was a murderer. He probably snapped because of those false rape allegations. He was just another Dorner who was oppressed by the system.

Big mommy government can not eliminate all risk and protect us. Those who give government the power to protect against all risk lose all freedom.

Panetta promotes mommy.

16 posted on 03/09/2013 3:43:59 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

You’re an idiot.


17 posted on 03/09/2013 3:49:51 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
You’re an idiot.

-I made my point.

18 posted on 03/09/2013 4:18:59 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

I correctly characterized it.


19 posted on 03/09/2013 4:21:23 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Bzzt. Wrong. Nice try at evasion. The issue that Panetta is raising is that UCMJ, as currently construed, can and does let rapists walk. Letting a convicted rapist walk usually is a bad idea. Just ask Dukakis.


20 posted on 03/10/2013 12:04:34 PM PDT by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson