They'll just have to keep killing U.S. citizens on American soil by less spectacularly visible methods.
Yeah - I would have widened out the subject. They did talk about it during the fillibuster, but it needs to be set in writing. Although it probably doesn’t matter. Some piece of paper isn’t going to stop them. Heck - the Constitution doesn’t stop them.
Then they lose some of the intimidation factor they were going for with the drone strikes. You would pay attention if your tea party neighbor got droned one night while you slept...
This does not mean that Obama will never use a drone against an American on American soil.
It just means that at this point in time he says he won’t.
But we all know what a liar he is.
>>>>Attorney General Eric Holder on Thursday responded to Paul in a letter that said the U.S. does not have the authority to conduct a drone attack against a U.S. citizen on American soil
My understanding is that the letter Holder sent to Paul said that the authority to kill US citizens on US soil would have to be evaluated and advised on a case-by-case basis . . . with Holder doing the evaluating and advising.
Is this correct?
That's bothering me. Senator Paul and everyone else are talking about drones. What about snipers? What about a Seal Team blowing up a meeting of radicals? We've got military units training in American towns. We had the military assist (I believe) in blowing up Americans in Waco.
You don't have to be Alex Jones to know that this is about more than drones.