Brennan refers to Jerusalem as “al Quds”. He also is always supportive of Islam and has said that jihad is a legitimate part of Islam.
Yes, I know that jihad CAN be an inner battle for “religious purity”, but he did NOT qualify his support of jihad by any definition.
There is a reason we pretend there is no Islamic terrorism. It’s now just undefined extremists. Brennan is part of that reason and he is the security advisor to the Precedent.
He is also (as is the Precedent) pushing for the success of the rebels in Syria even though many of them are Muslim Brotherhood and/or al Qaeda. The whole stinking Arab Spring thing is that way.
We are fortunate that some Egyptians are fighting back against the Muslim Brotherhood dictatorship, but Obama—as advised by Brennan—continues to give them billions even as our country is heading for financial devastation.
For me, it’s clearly game over on the question of his ultimate loyalty and it’s not the USA.
I believe “Al Quds” simply is Jerusalem in Arabic and Farsi. I certainly don’t refer to Jerusalum as Al Quds. I still occasionally refer to it a “Yerushalaim Shel Zahar” (Jerusalem of Gold). OK. Thumbs down on Brennan. If he did indeed embrace Islam then he is indeed an apostate. I think I read that he went to Fordham. Tsk Tsk.