If they are a terrorist and an imminent threat Holder seemed to say that they could be killed. My question is how do you define an imminent threat and terrorist? Even then, is it legal and most importantly who gets to make the definition of who is and who is not an imminent threat?
The Venezuelan Constitution was modeled on that of the United States. Chavez ignored that Constitution due to the fact he had control of the Army and their loyalty. He packed the higher ranks with political cronies. He then changed the Constitution.
The same thing is slowly happening here. Be afraid.
Moreso, how does “terrorist” have anything to do with “imminent threat”? The latter being sufficient regardless of the perpetrator’s motivation...