Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

What European countries have domestic hard coal sources out of the ones that have turned against nuclear? Germany has a lot of lignite (soft coal), which is not very efficient; it imports the higher-BTU hard coal that it intends to use.

Combined cycle plants have more moving parts. Thermodynamics can’t be evaded. Storage of gas under pressure is still a larger problem than storing coal.


19 posted on 03/06/2013 8:44:28 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai
"Combined cycle plants have more moving parts.

Overall, I'm not at all sure that the GT/ST comes out mechanically more complex than a coal plant. Remember, there is a LOT of cleaning/scrubbing/ash removal etc. that is no longer necessary.

"Thermodynamics can’t be evaded.

Nobody is evading thermodynamics. The simple fact is that the efficiency of a GT/ST natgas plant is a good deal higher than a ST coal plant.

"Storage of gas under pressure is still a larger problem than storing coal."

With natgas pipelined in, you don't NEED as much storage (if any).

22 posted on 03/06/2013 12:20:49 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson